Slaves


In corresponding with some of the submissives who send me e-mails, I have noticed a disturbing pattern - the number of women who are getting emotionally wounded by prematurely attempting to become “slaves”.

Now it’s important to get the terminology right, and I don’t know what other Doms and subs mean precisely when they talk about Master / slave relationships. For me becoming a “slave” represents an extremely intense and challenging form of D/s relationship, one in which the slave surrenders a significant proportion of her freedom, independence, rights and control to the Master. To me, this is something which should only be attempted by someone who has been thoroughly trained as a submissive by a Dom who knows what he is doing, and who has spent a considerable period of time exploring her submissiveness.

Some of those who I hear from haven’t even reached the point where I would regard them as submissive, let alone ready to become slaves. Some are surprised to learn that training is even required – surely it is enough just to want to obey a Dominant? To make matters clearer, I have started using a new term – “compliant” – to describe someone who has discovered within herself the desire to be submissive, but has not yet been trained to the point where I would describe her as “a submissive”. Between discovering you are compliant and becoming a submissive there has to be a period of training.

There also seem to be many misconceptions about this, as if training is nothing more than learning a few sexual tricks and how many sugars the Dom likes in his tea. So let me set out my view of training. Training for what? If I distil out the qualities that define a submissive for me, they would include obedience, truthfulness and openness. There could be others, but these three seem to subsume the rest. Obedience, truthfulness and openness – easy words to write, but amazingly difficult to achieve in practice.

Let me illustrate this with an example around obedience. A Dom wants to be able to give an instruction, hear the sub say “Yes, Sir”, and have it carried out. So far so good. Suppose my instruction is for the sub to collect a book from my favourite bookshop in Manchester. This might involve her making several train journeys, getting the appropriate buses or trams, finding the shop, buying the book, and returning the way she came, What if she’s afraid of trains, shops, getting lost or getting mugged in Manchester? If that fear is too intense she will be totally incapable of carrying out the instruction.

Even if a sub has no trouble carrying out the book-buying task, the chances are there will be another one she will baulk at. It might involve a social fear, a body image problem, an addiction, a fear of heights, animals, open spaces, being alone, or even being silent. Becoming obedient involves confronting edges – something I have written about in a previous post. Until she deals with her edges a compliant woman cannot be really submissive.

A similar problem occurs with truthfulness – a remarkably difficult thing to achieve consistently. Lying to cheat, defraud or gain advantage is relatively rare, but deceiving in order to avoid hurting someone, to avoid being disliked, to avoid conflict or rejection – these forms of untruthfulness are extremely common and difficult to stop.

Openness about feelings is another essential characteristic in a sub, because it allows a Dom to gauge what she needs and treat her accordingly. If a sub is out of touch with her feelings, or insists on putting a brave face on, smiling when she’s angry, saying she’s “fine” when she’s actually upset – these may deceive the Dom into believing that all is well when it’s not. Yet achieving openness requires a lot of hard work – overcoming shame, developing self-knowledge, letting go of the need to look good and being willing to reveal disliked aspects of her personality.

In my definition of submissive training, a Dom constantly pushes a compliant woman to confront her edges until she overcomes them, making it possible for her to become obedient, truthful and open. So, if a “compliant” gives herself as a slave to a Master, she’s very quickly going to come up against her edges and fail to be obedient, truthful; or open. It’s not that she isn’t willing – she just can’t do it. Punishment won’t make it any better – she needs training. After several attempts, either she gives up or the Master sends her away. She feels a failure, or worse, because she can’t understand why she can’t fulfil the demands of the Master – she feels that she’s a “bad” slave.

The Master-slave dynamic doesn’t suit everyone. It is one possible way of living a D/s lifestyle, but it isn’t the only way. Nor is it the ultimate pinnacle of submissive achievement, the “gold standard” by which all other D/s relationships are to be measured. I would suggest that it is possible for a woman to be independent and self-sufficient and still be submissive. If such a woman entered into a Master/slave relationship she might find the conflicts intolerable. There is enormous satisfaction and intensity to be found in being submissive, without necessarily having to be a slave.

To summarise, if you are compliant and new to D/s, take your time understanding your own submissive needs first, find a good Dom to train you to become properly submissive (not an easy task in itself), and only then think about whether being a slave is right for you.

Comments

  1. Thank you, Sir! Just when I needed this most!!

    ~J~

    ReplyDelete
  2. And, Sir, I was just wondering...how many sugars DO you like in your tea?

    :)

    ~J~

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is such an amazing thing to discover one's nature. The exhilaration often clouds one's judgment, and the results can be quite damaging...

    So how many sugars do you take???

    My guess is 2... ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. What a remarkable post! I love that you defined without defining the difference between submissive and slave and even added a 'less experienced class' of compliant. I'd like to think that I'm submissive, but within your post I find that I'm still in training to be submissive.

    While being a slave is not in my desires, being a surrendered submissive is. With the training I am acquiring and working towards I know that this goal is a long way off. I can only hope that my openness and honesty with my Dominant will bring me to his ultimate goals without a lot of frustration.

    Thank you for you openness and honesty. It has been eye opening and wonderful to read.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think another thing that seems to muddy the waters between the submissive and the slave are such pay sites like kink.com's "The training of O". You go to their site and their top banner says "4 days of slave training", and then people can pay to see these girls pushed to the limit. But these are not 'slaves' nor is it training. It's a performance (albeit a very enticing one to watch) and when the uninitiated stumble across it, they think a slave is just someone who's made to do things her "Master" wants.

    Thank you for your insight on this subject. It is a very responsible and approachable clarification that i wish more people would understand.

    ReplyDelete
  6. i am so happy to see you back posting! It is amazing how life has a way of getting in over drive at times. This post was worth the wait and mirrors many of the thoughts i have come to believe define my slavery. i struggled long to define my nature and at times question am i "truly" a slave or even a workable submissive. But also came to accept, with the guidance of my Master, that the principle tennants, or values, inherent to slavery for U/us are obedience, honesty, trust and respect. i am aware that there are many that would argue a slave should have no concern with such things and to them i say carry on..we each are on our own journey to our destiny and by embracing our True Nature we can make the trip an more HONEST experience with less internal conflict.

    i hope you had a very Happy New Year and 2008 brings you good health, and happiness, both personally and professionally. i look forward to more of your thoughts and experiences.

    s/nik

    ReplyDelete
  7. Trust and respect have come easily into our D/s relationship. Honesty requires ongoing hard work, obedience is mostly achieved and sometimes not. I push the boundaries and then we find the limits for both of us. So for us both Dominant and submissive play a part in establishing the depth of submission.

    It has been said on another blog that it is a tall ask, by a submissive that wishes to become a slave, for 24/7 control and i think this needs to be highlighted. It requires a tremendous amount of care from a Dominant and very few will be capable or willing to give it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you to everyone who has commented on this post - it's something I feel strongly about and it's good to know that others are thinking along similar lines. If D/s is done well it can be an intense experience that can be very rewarding, but it is so easy for that intensity to swing from positive to negative in an instant.

    Of course it's not just submissives who need training, there is a lot of skill needed to be a good Dom. It's not at all clear to me how Doms are acquiring these skills, but it seems really important that they do.

    Finally I think my sucrose consumption should remain shrouded in mystery for a little while longer :)

    Happy 2008 to you all!

    PH

    ReplyDelete
  9. your points are well taken. however, i would like to separate the issues of training and understanding what a submissive is getting into from the issue of terminology. i do think that one needs some standard of the meaning of words in order to discuss theory and such. however, i hope you have no objection to creative independence in the use of words WITHIN a relationship, as long as the participants understand that what they mean by "slave", for example, is not necessarily the same as the rest of the community means.

    words are very powerful, as i'm sure you know. when the man who owns and loves me says i am his slave, when i say that he owns me, when he occasionally actually addresses me as "slave", the psychological effect is enormous and does in fact reflect some truths about the relationship, even though by no stretch of the imagination would an outsider characterize us as having a true Master-slave relationship. however, we see what we are and have and do as a piece of performance art, and rather than trying to abide by the "rules" are more likely to be surprised to find that much of our behaviour is fairly standard.

    one curious thing is that early on, and out of some purely inner compulsion, i have had a strong commitment to no lying and no holding back. this is one of a number of things which have convinced me that the D/s dynamic can be a remarkably healthy structure for a relationship.

    (FYI - speaking of following rules, or not, i don't use caps because i'm a lazy and lousy typist, not from any feeling that it's an appropriate standard for a submissive.)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hello!!

    Time for a February post!!

    Can i ask for a topic, or suggest a subject? It is: RULES!!

    Why do submissives crave them?

    Are they necessary for D/s relationships to thrive?

    Do you feel RULES are/should be specific to each individual situation or are there some guiding principles you feel are necessary in all working D/s relationships?

    ~s/nik

    ReplyDelete
  11. enjoyed this very much ... I think it is very easy to become confused by the amount of "creative" material on the web regarding the reality of a D/s or M/s relationship. Certaintly, it IS a 'free' world and people are entitled to play whatever games they wish ... but I DO think that those who indulge in it as "play" should be honest about the extent of their interest.

    Regardless, I loved the post and agreed with just about everything you said.

    I am very much a submissive and cannot conceive of actually being a 'slave' nor does my D. hanker for one; in fact, for HIM, the concept is distasteful. Not again, that either of us thinks it wrong, just not for us.

    I particuarly like the fact that you pointed out that a woman could be independent and self sufficient and STILL be a submissive; which describes me LOL - as I am a very committed feminist among other things! Regardless, D. says I am an exemplary submissive as well!

    I look forward to reading more from you!

    selkie

    ReplyDelete
  12. i am going to join this site... i didn't realize there were so many in the lifestyle and i really like what you've written so far.

    i agree largely with what you've said here. There is one thing though. A Master or Mistress should know the slaves fears, etc, before ever issuing an order otherwise They DO set them up to fail.

    Mistress has talked with me at great length about the match being vital and then communication has to happen at every level. W/we play without safewords because She knows me so well that my body language tells Her all She needs to know about me in scene and i am free to talk with Her.

    Mistress also doesn't put a training collar on a submissive for a year and then it's another year before they are offered a permanent collar and that's only if they have trained well. So by the time She expects a person to behave as a slave, they have had two years of training.

    This isn't a, "look and see how great my Mistress is," but rather an example of how long it takes to really know someone and the care it takes on the part of the Dom/me to own a slave. With power comes responsibility.

    Turning ones life and body over to Another is a huge thing... too many do it far too quickly.

    Just my two cents...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Are you still around?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theory of human dominance and submission - an outline.

Edges